| |
WHAT
IS MOST IMPORTANT FOR YOUR QUALITY OF LIFE?: A PILOT STUDY ON INDIVIDUAL
QUALITY OF LIFE OF ADULTS WITH CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE.
Moons
P., Raes E., Deyk K., De Geest S., Geweling M., Budts W.
Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, Katholieke Universiteit
Leuven, Belgium; Division of Congenital Cardiology, University Hospitals
of Leuven, Belgium; Institute of Nursing Science, University of
Basel, Switzerland
Although
life expectancy of patients with congenital heart disease increased
substantially, many patients experience the heart defect intruding
on their daily life. The importance of quality of life research
in this patient population, therefore, emerged. Evaluation of quality
of life is highly subjective, necessitating an approach assessing
the most relevant areas for quality of life for each individual
patient, in contrast to predetermined questionnaires. The aim of
this pilot study was to examine quality of life and its individual
determinants in adults with congenital heart disease.
Methods:
In a 3-month period, 134 consecutive patients with congenital heart
disease (67.2% males), with a median age of 24 (Q1=20; Q3=28.25)
years, were included in this cross-sectional study. The most prevalent
diagnoses were tetralogy of Fallot (21.6%), ventricular septal defect
(16.4%), aorta stenosis (14.9%) and coarctation of the aorta (12.7%).
Quality of life was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
ranging from 0 to 100. To examine determinants of individual patient's
quality of life, the SEIQoL-DW was used. This instrurment comprises
3 successive steps:
1) nomination by the respondent of the 5 areas most important
for his/her quality of life,
2) rating of the actual status or fulfilment for each specified
area on a VAS from 'worst possible' [O] to 'best possible' [100],
and
3) quantification of the relative importance of each nominated
area in comparison with each other, using a 5-segment disk.
Results:
Patients perceive their overall quality of life as good (VAS median
80; Q1=73 -Q3=86). The SEIQoL-DW identified 13 areas affecting patients'
quality of life. The table describes the percentage of patients
reporting the respective areas (step 1), the median actual status
or fulfilment (step 2), and the relative importance for each cue
(step 3).
|
Domains
important for the quality of life
|
Step
1
|
Step
2
|
Step
3
|
|
Significant
others
|
73.9%
|
85.5
|
23%
|
|
Job/education
|
51.5%
|
68
|
18%
|
|
Leisure
|
50%
|
74
|
17%
|
|
Health
|
49.3%
|
76
|
23%
|
|
Social
network
|
49.3%
|
75
|
20%
|
|
Personal
values with respect to others, life and society
|
47%
|
79
|
20%
|
|
Financial
means and material well-being
|
29.9%
|
67
|
16%
|
|
Psychological well-being
|
14.2%
|
76
|
19%
|
|
Capacities
and impediments due to the heart defect
|
11.9%
|
49
|
17%
|
|
Future
|
10.4%
|
80
|
20%
|
|
Health
care
|
3%
|
87.5
|
16.5%
|
|
Nourishment
|
3%
|
76
|
12%
|
|
Pets
|
2.2%
|
91
|
27%
|
Conclusion:
Individual quality of life assessment in adults with congenital
heart disease provides a detailed picture of issues relevant for
patients' quality of life. Although some aspects are indicated by
only few patients, e.g. pets, the fulfilment of these aspects and
the relative importance may be very high for them, supporting the
added value of individual quality of life assessments. These issues
should be addressed in comprehensive health care programmes aiming
at improving patients' quality of life.
<<
back
|